MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2550241832

Collaboration in the age of augmented reality

2008· article· en· W2550241832 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE International Technology Management Conference · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSoftware Engineering and Design Patterns
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCollaborative softwareComputer scienceThe InternetParallelsHuman–computer interactionAugmented realityFocus (optics)World Wide WebVirtual realityMultimediaDimension (graph theory)Virtual worldEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Groupware and socialware focus on human interaction and usually provide document sharing and team management support. During the last few years, however, people and documents have been joined by Internet-connected electronic devices that produce and consume data and allow humans to observe and control real-world processes. This co-presence of humans, data, and electronic devices on Internet constitutes a virtual universe with a new dimension, one that parallels the physical world and merges with it seamlessly. Unfortunately, no applications currently support this new reality while providing sophisticated groupware and socialware features at the same time. We propose a list of properties of an ideal environment supporting human, document, and device interaction, and describe a design that would satisfy these requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it