MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2550243899

Automatic rule generation for procedural modeling of a sketched tree using genetic programming and particle swarm optimization

2013· article· en· W2550243899 on OpenAlexaff
Kaveh Hassani, Won‐Sook Lee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTree (set theory)Artificial intelligenceSet (abstract data type)Genetic programmingParticle swarm optimizationMachine learningData miningProgramming languageMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advantages: • Memory efficiency. • Dynamism (i.e. growth process). • Scalability (i.e. growth level). • Portability. • Generating identical trees while preserving the general aspects. Procedural Tree Modeling Proposed Approach Tree modeling is the process of generating realistic 3D models of trees within virtual environments. These models are widely employed in computer animation, game design, and botanology. To address this demand, several approaches such as image-based modeling and procedural modeling have been widely explored. L-system is the most exploited procedural modeling paradigm in this area. It employs a few rules to model the growth of a tree. It has been shown that using high order L-systems leads to realistic 3D tree models. In many cases, only a sketch of a tree is drawn and the rules are not available. Defining a set of rules to reproduce the drawn tree is a tedious task. In this research, a combination of genetic programming and particle swarm optimization is proposed to automatically generate a set of rules from a sketch to model the corresponding tree.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlFrench-language works237,207