MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2550330425 · doi:10.1016/j.artres.2016.08.032

PO-27 A NEW SOFTWARE FOR DETERMINING CHANGES IN ARTERIAL DIAMETER OVER TIME

2016· article· en· W2550330425 on OpenAlexafffund
Ka Zuj, Jason Deglint, Ahmed Gawish, Alexander Wong, David A. Clausi, Richard L. Hughson

Bibliographic record

VenueArtery Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooResearch Institute for Aging
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsMedicineSoftwareCardiologyOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: The purpose was to investigate the ability of a new software, developed by our group, to provide continuous measures of arterial diameter from recorded ultrasound video.Methods: Software (MAUI) was developed to assess arterial diameter using active contours to accurately detect the vessel walls in recorded ultrasound video.Ultrasound imaging was used to acquire longitudinal, B-Mode images of the common carotid artery (CCA) with videos recorded for later analysis.A single recorded 10s video was used to gain an indication of the reproducibility and repeatability of MAUI.For this assessment, two investigators (E1 and E2) each performed 10 measurements of the test video using the MAUI software.MAUI was then used to process several longer videos (w5min) to assess the ability of the software to continuously process data over longer periods of time.Results: MAUI provided a measurement of vessel diameter (media to media border) for each frame of the recorded video.The ten assessments of the test video resulted in average standard deviation of 0.002AE0.003cmfor E1 and 0.003AE0.003cmfor E2 for each frame measurement.Overall analysis of the test video resulted in an average diameter, measured across eight cardiac cycles, of 0.781AE0.0005cmand 0.780AE0.0007cmfor E1 and E2 respectively.Measures by E1 and E2 ranged from 0.781 to 0.782cm and 0.779 to 0.781cm respectively.When processing the 5min videos, MAUI was able to continuously track the vessel walls throughout the entire video.Conclusions: Preliminary assessments suggest that MAUI software represents a viable method for the continuous assessment of arterial diameter over time with high repeatability and low interrater variability.Use of this software may be especially applicable for studies investigating acute changes in vessel dimensions as well as the study of vascular properties in health and disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtery ResearchSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207