MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Inhibition of Platelet-Prothrombianse by a Covalent Antithrombin-Heparin Complex.

2012· article· en· W2550437889 on OpenAlexaff
Ivan Stevic, Howard H.W. Chan, Ankush Chander, Leslie R. Berry, Anthony K.C. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProthrombinaseAntithrombinChemistryHeparinThrombinPlateletCovalent bondBiochemistryCoagulationEnzymeBiophysicsPharmacologyStereochemistryInternal medicineBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2212 Introduction: Factor Xa is protected within the prothrombinase complex from inhibition by heparin. We have developed a covalent antithrombin-heparin complex (ATH) with enhanced anticoagulant activity. Previously, we have shown that ATH is able to inhibit coagulation enzymes much more efficiently than regular antithrombin+heparin (AT+UFH). For example, ATH inhibited TF/VIIa ∼30-fold faster compared to AT+UFH. Furthermore, we have also demonstrated that ATH is capable of inhibiting Xa within a prothrombinase complex assembled on synthetic phospholipid vesicles better than AT+UFH. However, ATH's effect on prothrombinase when the complex is formed on a more native system such as platelets has never been explored. Thus, the objective of the present study is to determine the ability of ATH vs AT+UFH to inhibit Xa within the prothrombinase complex when the enzyme complex is assembled on the platelet system. Methods: Discontinuous second order rate constant assays were performed to obtain k2-values for inhibition of free or prothrombinase-bound Xa by AT+UFH or ATH. Freshly prepared resting platelets were subjected to inhibition analysis by first incubating them with Xa, Va, Ca2+ and pefabloc®-TH (thrombin inhibitor) in different wells of a 96-well plate for 3 min at 37 °C. Prothrombin was then simultaneously added to all wells to initiate thrombin generation, followed by addition of AT+UFH or ATH inhibitors to each well at specific time intervals. Reactions were neutralized by simultaneous addition of polybrene, Na2EDTA and Xa-specific substrate S-2222™ in buffer. The remaining Xa enzyme activity was obtained and final k2-values calculated. For experiments requiring activated platelets, freshly isolated platelets were activated with 5 μM calcium ionophore A23187 + 4 mM CaCl2 for 15 min at room temperature. The activated platelets were then tested in inhibition assays as described above. To investigate the roles of individual components of the prothrombinase complex on the anticoagulant effects of AT+UFH and ATH, additional experiments were performed where components of the complex (prothrombin, activated platelets or Va) were omitted prior to reaction with inhibitors. Thrombin generation was used to assess functionality of the activated platelet-prothrombinase system in the presence of inhibitors using a thrombin-specific substrate S-2238™. Results: The k2-values (×108M−1min−1) for inhibition of free Xa or resting platelet-prothrombinase were similar for both inhibitors, although the overall inhibition rates achieved by the ATH were 2-fold faster than AT+UFH (p<0.001). Since activated platelets are required for enhanced prothrombinase function, we then compared inhibition of free vs activated platelet-prothrombinase by the two inhibitors (platelet activation was confirmed with flow cytometry using an anti CD-41 antibody). No differences were observed in the k2-values between free Xa (3.96±0.23) and activated platelet prothrombinase (3.83±0.39) for ATH reactions. However, the k2-values for inhibition of free Xa by AT+UFH was 2.37±0.32, and assembly of Xa within the activated platelet-prothrombinase resulted in a reduction in the k2-values to 0.99±0.22 (p<0.001), thus confirming a moderate 60% protection of Xa by the prothrombinase components. However, omitting the components (prothrombin, activated platelets or Va) from the complex resulted in higher k2-values (1.76±0.37, 2.29±0.26 and 2.52±0.32, respectively p<0.01) for AT+UFH, and as expected, no net effect was observed for ATH. Thrombin generation was inhibited significantly by both AT+UFH and ATH compared to the control (p<0.001), but further analysis of thrombin potential yielded greater inhibition by ATH compared to AT+UFH (p<0.05). Conclusion: In this study, we report inhibition of the prothrombinase complex on the surface of resting and activated platelets. Consistent with previous investigations, a moderate protection of Xa was observed when the activated platelet-prothrombinase was inhibited by AT+UFH. ATH on the other hand, targets and inhibits prothrombinase complexed-Xa as fast as free Xa, and at inhibition rates that were significantly faster than AT+UFH. Thus, overall the covalent conjugate enhances anticoagulation of surface-bound enzymes and offers advantages over conventional heparin for the treatment of cell-based coagulation in vivo. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→