MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2550439619

Trajectoires sociales et scolaires de jeunes de 16-24 ans issus de l'immigration en formation générale des adultes et analyse de deux projets de «Persévérance scolaire» (2007 et 2009) [ressource électronique]

2010· article· fr· W2550439619 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maryse Potvin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugees
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette etude exploratoire s'est interessee aux trajectoires scolaires et sociales de jeunes de 16-24 ans, de 1ere ou de 2eme generations issues de l'immigration, qui se retrouvent en formation generale aux adultes (FGA) pour terminer leurs etudes secondaires, de meme qu'a deux projets de « perseverance scolaire » s'adressant a ces jeunes a la Commission scolaire de Montreal (CSDM). Cet article presente les faits saillants du premier volet sur les trajectoires, et souleve un ensemble d'hypotheses qui a conduit a une seconde etude sur les processus systemiques et les pratiques de classement et d'orientation dans six commissions scolaires (Montreal et Sherbrooke) et leurs impacts sur les trajectoires scolaires de ces apprenants. Cette etude est la premiere au Quebec a dresser un « diagnostic » qualitatif des parcours de jeunes de 16-24 ans issus de l'immigration au secteur des adultes, l'experience scolaire de ces jeunes etant encore peu documentee, autant au plan statistique qu'au plan des pratiques institutionnelles et des perceptions des acteurs dans ce secteur. - Tire du doc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugeesFrench-language works237,207