MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2550501898 · doi:10.1002/mdc3.12459

Fatigue, Sleep Disturbances, and Their Influence on Quality of Life in Cervical Dystonia Patients

2016· article· en· W2550501898 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders Clinical Practice · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCervical dystoniaAnxietyDepression (economics)Quality of life (healthcare)ComorbidityRating scaleMedicineSpasmodic TorticollisDystoniaPhysical therapyVisual analogue scalePsychologyInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Nonmotor symptoms ( NMS ) are highly prevalent in cervical dystonia ( CD ). In general, fatigue and sleep are important NMS that determine a decreased health‐related quality of life ( HR ‐QoL), but their influence in CD is unknown. The authors systematically investigated fatigue, excessive daytime sleepiness ( EDS ), and sleep quality in patients with CD and controls and assessed the influence of psychiatric comorbidity, pain, and dystonia motor severity. They also examined the predictors of HR ‐QoL. Methods The study included 44 patients with CD and 43 matched controls. Fatigue, EDS , and sleep quality were assessed with quantitative questionnaires and corrected for depression and anxiety using analysis of covariance. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression Scale‐jerks/tremor subscale were used to score motor severity and to assess whether motor characteristics could explain an additional part of the variation in fatigue and sleep‐related measures. HR ‐QoL was determined with the RAND ‐36 item Health Survey, and predictors of HR ‐QoL were assessed using multiple regression. Results Fatigue scores were increased independently from psychiatric comorbidity (4.0 vs. 2.7; P < 0.01), whereas EDS (7.3 vs. 7.4; P = 0.95) and sleep quality (6.5 vs. 6.1; P = 0.73) were highly associated with depression and anxiety. In patients with CD , motor severity did not explain the variations in fatigue (change in the correlation coefficient [ΔR 2 ] = 0.06; P = 0.15), EDS (ΔR 2 = 0.00; P = 0.96), or sleep quality (ΔR 2 = 0.04; P = 0.38) scores. Fatigue, EDS , psychiatric comorbidity, and pain predicted a decreased QoL. Conclusion Independent from psychiatric comorbidity and motor severity, fatigue appeared to be a primary NMS . Sleep‐related measures were highly associated with psychiatric comorbidity, but not with motor severity. Only NMS predicted HR ‐QoL, which emphasizes the importance of attention to NMS in patients with CD .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it