MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2550549594 · doi:10.1109/hic.2014.7038940

Detrended fluctuation analysis of photoplethysmogram pulse rate intervals in sleep disordered breathing

2014· article· en· W2550549594 on OpenAlexaff
Parastoo Dehkordi, Ainara Garde, Walter Karlen, Christian L. Petersen, J. Mark Ansermino, Guy A. Dumont

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoplethysmogramDetrended fluctuation analysisPolysomnographyHeartbeatHeart rateHeart rate variabilityPulse (music)CardiologySleep disordered breathingPulse rateMedicineBreathingRespiratory rateInternal medicineAnesthesiaScalingMathematicsApneaBlood pressurePhysicsObstructive sleep apneaOpticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fluctuation of heartbeat intervals is irregular and erratic in healthy young individuals. Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) influences the fluctuation of heart rate. In this study, we investigated the effects of SDB on heart rate fluctuations by analyzing the short- and long-range correlation of photoplethysmogram pulse to pulse intervals (PPIs). We recruited 160 children referred to British Columbia Children's Hospital for overnight polysomnography and recorded the photoplethysmogram (PPG) using the Phone Oximeter™. Detrended fluctuation analysis was applied to analyze the scaling behavior of PPIs time series in children with and without SDB. We found stronger short-range (10 to 40 pulses) and long-range (70 to 200 pulses) correlation in children with SDB. This reflects the loss of irregularity of heart rate in children with SDB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisFrench-language works237,207