MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2550641862 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2016-0486

Topological indices of rhombus type silicate and oxide networks

2016· article· en· W2550641862 on OpenAlex
Muhammad Javaid, Masood Ur Rehman, Jinde Cao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRhombusTopological indexQuantitative structure–activity relationshipMultiplicative functionSilicateChemistryCartesian coordinate systemTopology (electrical circuits)GraphComputational chemistryCombinatoricsMathematicsStereochemistryGeometryOrganic chemistryMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a molecular graph, a numeric quantity that characterizes the whole structure of a graph is called a topological index. In the studies of quantitative structure – activity relationship (QSAR) and quantitative structure – property relationship (QSPR), topological indices are utilized to guess the bioactivity of chemical compounds. In this paper, we compute general Randić, first general Zagreb, generalized Zagreb, multiplicative Zagreb, atom-bond connectivity (ABC), and geometric arithmetic (GA) indices for the rhombus silicate and rhombus oxide networks. In addition, we also compute the latest developed topological indices such as the fourth version of ABC (ABC 4 ), the fifth version of GA (GA 5 ), augmented Zagreb, and Sanskruti indices for the foresaid networks. At the end, a comparison between all the indices is included, and the result is shown with the help of a Cartesian coordinate system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it