MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PTH-061 The Proliferation of Human Intestinal Macrophage Subsets in IBD and Controls

2016· article· en· W2550700114 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth S. McDonald, Wright Pb, CC Bain, A. Mcl Mowat, DR Gaya, SWF Milling

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive System and Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD11cMacrophageCD64Mannose receptorCD163ImmunologyCD14Lamina propriaPopulationBiologyHistiocyteCrohn's diseaseFlow cytometryCD68Inflammatory bowel diseaseDendritic cellMedicinePathologyAntigenPhenotypeDiseaseImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is thought to be dependent on cell populations of the mononuclear phagocyte (MNP) system; monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs). However, it is not yet fully understood how these functionally different MNP populations contribute to IBD immunopathogenesis. To address this, it is necessary to identify the functional and phenotypic attributes of the different human intestinal MNP populations. Methods Fresh colonoscopic biopsies were taken, after signed informed consent, from patient with Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and controls undergoing polyp surveillance scope. Biopsies were rapidly transferred to the lab for analysis. Using 12 parameter flow cytometry we have developed new strategies to identify and differentiate human intestinal MNPs, to enhance our understanding of their involvement in IBD. Results Within the colonic lamina propria, we unambiguously differentiate macrophage populations from dendritic cells (DCs: CD64− HLA-DR+ CD11c+; macrophages: CD64+ CD206+ HLA-DR+). The colonic macrophages homogeneously express CD33 and CD68, two previously reported markers of human macrophages. Furthermore, we demonstrate heterogeneous expression of CD14 within this macrophage population. Further characterisation of the colonic macrophages identified two distinct groups, identifiable by their differential expression of the mannose receptor, CD206. To address the characteristics of these macrophage populations we assessed their proliferation, by measuring Ki67 expression. Surprisingly, all populations were found to proliferate at higher than expected levels, both in the steady state and during inflammation. Conclusion We have developed novel protocols to isolate and identify MNP populations from human intestinal lamina propria. Human macrophages exhibit significant levels of proliferation under steady state conditions, and in samples from patients with IBD. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReproductive System and PregnancyFrench-language works237,207