MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2550703498 · doi:10.2118/182912-ms

Evaluating a Complex Low-Resistivity Pay Carbonate Reservoir Onshore Abu Dhabi: From Model to Implementation

2016· article· en· W2550703498 on OpenAlexaff
Ayham Ashqar, Miho Uchida, Andi A. Salahuddin, Saheed Olawale Olayiwola, Adedapo N. Awolayo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical resistivity and conductivityPetrophysicsCarbonateAbu dhabiGeologyElectrical resistivity tomographyPetroleum engineeringEnvironmental geologySoil scienceHydrogeologyPorosityMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Early identification of low resistivity pay (LRP) reservoir is vital in assessing its prospect and capability. Productive reservoirs may exhibit low resistivity and consequently, their potential is simply overlooked. Remapping these intervals can have significant production and reserve implications. Traditionally, resistivity logs are used to identify pay intervals due to the resistivity contrast between oil and formation water. However, when pay intervals exhibit low resistivity, such logs return low confidence in defining hydrocarbon potential. Due to the complexity of low resistivity pay (LRP), its cause and proper mitigation should be determined prior to applying a solution. Researchers have identified several reasons responsible for this occurrence; among which are the presence of heterogeneous pore structures specifically micro-porosity, fractures, paramagnetic minerals, and deep conductive mud invasion. Almost all preceding publications assume a technique will work but not the other. However, this is the first time, to our knowledge; an integrated approach is used to develop LRP assessment workflow. We have integrated the information coming from geology (e.g., thin-section, XRD), formation pressure and well tests, NMR, MICP, and dean stark data. The integration successfully identified and remapped the carbonate low resistivity reservoir. This model was validated in an appraisal well on Abu Dhabi mainland, for that an extended data was acquired. Thereafter, the integrated LRP model was compared with the computed water saturation from conventional resistivity tools. The validation was successful in terms of confirming the prognosis. Interpreting the results from the multidisciplinary integrated model confirms a deeper Free Water Level (FWL), hence oil pool extension. Further analysis showed that the causes of LRP in this considered formation was limited to presence of micro-porosity and high saline mud invasion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207