The so-called heresy case at Galt; containing the judicial record and history of the case before the courts of the Presbyterian church in Canada.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two years later he persuaded J. D. Cranston and some of his friends to visit a series of public services where this subject was the chief topic for consideration, and here his friends entered into the same spiritual experience.This was not to them the simple outcome of some new doctrine heard for the first time and then accepted under the stimulus of high tide emotion, but was really the result of a lengthened period of examination of the subject, in the light of conscious unsatisfactory Christian experience, of listening to Mr. Caldwell's testimony, of close examination of his life lived in their presence, of study of the Word and of prayer.As might be expected the united testimony of several witnesses awakened still greater interest in the subject of the higher life, and it was not long before many of their fellow church members began to enquire minutely concerning their improved experience and the way to secure like faith.This naturally suggested the idea of having set times to meet the wants of such inquirers, and so the homes of Mr. Cranston and others were thrown open for all who were desirous of coming.Particular care was taken to have no such gatherings during the times when services of a general character were held in Knox Church.But concerning district or cottage prayer meetings such precautions were not deemed necessary, for it was generally under- stood that these cottage meetings were simply intended to accommodate those who by reason of the distance or other hindrances were unable to attend the weekly prayer meeting at the church.It was whilst thus occupied and with much success, not only in helping church members but also others outside the pale of the church, that the present trial was instituted, the different phases of which the following records will bring out and explain minutely.TJlr; CHRISTIAN EXPERIENCE OF J. K.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.024 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".