MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hyperferritinemia: An Unexpected Effect of Treatment with Danazol

2008· article· en· W2550791139 on OpenAlexaff
Pamela Skrabek, Donald S. Houston

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanazolMedicineFerritinHaptoglobinGastroenterologyInternal medicineAutoimmune hemolytic anemiaAnemiaDiscontinuationHemolytic anemiaMalignancyImmunologyEndocrinologyEndometriosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hyperferritinemia is most often found in patients as a result of iron overload, infection, inflammation, or malignancy. Danazol, a synthetic derivative of ethinyl testosterone, has not been reported to cause hyperferritinemia. We present three patients observed to have extreme increases in serum ferritin during treatment with danazol. CASES: The first case is a 67 year old male with autoimmune hemolytic anemia, whose ferritin level rose from 983 to 3472 μg/L six months after starting danazol 200mg three times daily. The second is a 79 year old woman with immune thrombocytopenic purpura, whose ferritin was found to be 1109 μg/L after one month on danazol 200mg twice daily (BID) then decreased to188 μg/L one month after discontinuation. The third case had the most dramatic findings. This is a 56 year old female with autoimmune hemolytic anemia characterized by both warm and cold agglutinins with a refractory course. After less than one month on danazol 200 mg BID her ferritin increased from 521 to 2877μg/L. Severe hyperferritinemia persisted until danazol was discontinued. At this time, there was an abrupt fall from 2628 to 191μg/L. In each of these cases, there was no alternative explanation for the changes in ferritin level. In particular, there was no evidence of activation of the acute phase response, nor any indication of hepatotoxicity as reflected in liver enzymes or bilirubin levels. Since observing these cases, we have monitored ferritin levels in 3 other patients being treated in our clinic with danazol, and have seen no change in ferritin level in these 3 patients. DISCUSSION: The effect of danazol in these cases may represent a direct androgenic effect or a non-specific effect. The synthesis of a number of plasma proteins by hepatocytes is known to be influenced by androgen receptor interactions, but this has not been reported to be the case for ferritin; instead it is thought that higher ferritin levels in men are a result of higher iron stores. Nonetheless it is possible that there is a previously unreported influence of androgens on ferritin synthesis, which might be more apparent in patients with moderate iron overload (two of our patients had mildly elevated baseline ferritin levels). An idiosyncratic effect unrelated to androgenic activity seems more likely. (Similarly, there is an inconsistent therapeutic effect of danazol in immune thrombocytopenia and hemolytic anemia and the exact mechanism of action, possibly related to immunosuppression rather than androgen effect, is unknown.) The rapid return of the ferritin level to baseline after discontinuation of danazol shows that the effect is not a result of a change in iron stores. The possibility that danazol (or a metabolite thereof) interferes with the assay of ferritin in serum is made unlikely by our observations in several other danazol-treated patients, in whom no change in ferritin levels were seen. The findings in our cases should be considered when measuring ferritin in patients receiving danazol. Hyperferritinemia in these patients is an unreliable predictor of iron overload. Whether this observation has any implication with respect to the toxicity of danazol is not known.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207