MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2550847806 · doi:10.1121/1.4969172

Normal-rate to fast-rate speech conversion using non-linear compression maps

2016· article· en· W2550847806 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Fry, Eric Vatikiotis‐Bateson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceIntelligibility (philosophy)Speech recognitionNaturalnessSpeech codingSet (abstract data type)Data compression ratioSpeech processingCompression (physics)Artificial intelligenceImage compressionImage processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new technique to convert normal-rate speech into intelligible fast-rate, speeded speech. Speeded speech has long been recognized for its potential to improve spoken media comprehension; however, current tools to significantly speed playback of non-text media are insufficient due to their reliance on inaccurate phoneme analysis. With the ever increasing amount of non-text media online, a method to speed playback that is agnostic of phonemes is needed. Our technique uses spectral and source components of the acoustics to generate a non-linear compression map that characterizes how conversational-rate speech signals are compressed to achieve analogue fast-rate speech signals. A data set containing conversational- and fast-rate speech pairs was processed to determine compression maps corresponding to each pair. A Recursive Neural Network (RNN) was trained on the set of normal-rate speech and the corresponding compression maps. The RNN was then used to generate compression maps for novel normal-rate speech and ultimately output a fast-rate speech signal. Elicited fast-rate speech and speeded speech conversions technique are now being compared perceptually for intelligibility and naturalness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.491
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207