MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2550865138 · doi:10.14529/ssh160117

The artists brothers Basov’s ornamental art (1580—1630-ies): for historiography of the problem

2016· article· en· W2550865138 on OpenAlex
E. Sherstobitova

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the South Ural State University Series «Social Sciences and the Humanities» · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyStyle (visual arts)FlourishingArtQuarter (Canadian coin)Art historyLiteratureHistoryClassicsArchaeologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research based on the studying of Old Russian manuscripts, ornamentation revealed artists, among them brothers Stefan Basov, Feodor Basov, Gavrila (Ivan) Basov — outstanding masters during the birth and flourishing of Early Printed style ornament occupied special place. Brothers Basov,s art has not been studied before the start of the 21st century. The great interest is connected with the identification of new manuscripts, created by the brothers. Its description from the point of view of Old Russian manuscripts, decoration requires further research. The paper is concerned with historiography of brothers Stephan, Feodor and Gavrila (Ivan) Basov,s art. The research is about Early Printed style in the Old Russian manuscripts at the last quarter of the 16th — the first third of the 17th centuries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.010
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it