Engineering Students’ Perception of Project-Based Learning Activities at the School of Engineering, UBC Okanagan Campus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Junior and Senior Engineering Students’ Perception of Project Based Learning Activities at the School of Engineering, UBC Okanagan CampusThe School of Engineering at UBC Okanagan Campus offers three engineering programs (civil,mechanical and electrical), with the first two years common for all engineering students.Through the course of their education the students are involved in several interdisciplinarydesign projects, including three major design projects in their first and second year as well as theCapstone design projects, a fourth year design course in which students work on industrysponsored real-life projects. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of these project-based learningactivities, and in order to create a better understanding of how students evolve through the courseof their study at the School of Engineering, a targeted survey for the first, second and fourth yearstudents has been designed and conducted. The survey covers students’ views on the structure ofdesign courses, the level of difficulty in relation to other courses, and the build-up of designskills toward the fourth year capstone projects. In this paper the results from the first 2 years ofthe study will be presented and discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".