MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2550991687

Is Influence Illusionary? The Effects of Ownership on Political Coverage In Hollinger and CanWest Owned Newspapers

2015· article· en· W2550991687 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperPoliticsBusinessAdvertisingDemographic economicsPsychologyPolitical scienceEconomicsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CanWest is owned by the Asper family who has an amicable history with the Liberals, dating back to the years when the late family patriarch Israel Asper was leader of the Manitoba Liberals. Hollinger’s major shareholder at the time of sale was the conservative stalwart Conrad Black. This change in ownership had the potential to adversely affect Canada’s media landscape as not only had ownership changed hands but the partisanship of the owners as well. Under Black’s proprietorship many opponents, including Jean Chrétien, claimed that the National Post proliferated an ideology-driven view. The Post’s emphasis on conservative interests afforded it the reputation as the “ … catalyst and cheerleader for the emergence of the Canadian Alliance Party, an intervention into national life that is almost unprecedented for a newspaper in the post-war era.”1 Black was accused of using his newspaper chain for the promotion of his political and financial interests- having neither regard for the informational needs of his readers, nor for quality, objective journalism. Black’s critics were abundant and as vitriolic in their rants as Black was ruthless in his corporate downsizing. Former employee Claude Gravel claimed his resignation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207