MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551021998

Analysis of the Growth and Shift in Sectoral Part-time Employment in Canada 1987-1999

2001· article· en· W2551021998 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mian B. Ali, P. Nagarajan, Wimal Rankaduwa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional Economic and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSection (typography)Aggregate (composite)EconomicsEconomyNational accountsAggregate dataLabour economicsEconomic geographyBusinessMacroeconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aggregate employment data mask some profound trends in the performance of the economy. The overall performance of the national economy is the result of overall economic performance of the sub-national economies. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the changing pattern of industrial activity at the provincial level, and hence the changing composition of employment, vis-a-vis part-time employment across the provinces is vitally important. Consequently in this study we endeavor to analyze and delineate the changes in part-time employment pattern of the provincial economies in the past decade. A modified version of the ShiftShare model, as developed by Stilwell [1969], is used for an in-depth analysis of recently available 15 sectoral classification of employment data which include some sectors of the knowledge based economy. The first section describes th e m ethodology, ai ms an d sh ortcomings of the Sh ift-Share technique. The second section specifies the modified version of the model. The results are presented in the third section and finally the conclusions of the study are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRegional Economic and Spatial AnalysisFrench-language works237,207