<i>Adia</i>: Achieving High Link Utilization with Coflow-Aware Scheduling in Data Center Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Link utilization has received extensive attention since data centers become the most pervasive platform for data-parallel applications. A specific job of such applications involves communication among multiple machines. The recently proposed coflow abstraction depicts such communication through a group of parallel flows, and captures application performance through corresponding communication requirements. Existing techniques to improve link utilization, however, either restrict themselves to achieving work conservation, or merely focus on flow-level metrics and ignore coflow-level performance. In this paper, we address the coflow-aware scheduling problem with the objective of maximizing link utilization. Through theoretic analyses, we formulate the coflow-aware scheduling problem as a NP-hard open shop scheduling problem with heterogeneous concurrency. We design Adia, a hierarchical scheduling framework to conduct both inter- and intra- link scheduling. The design of Adia leverages priority-based scheduling while guarantees work-conserving and starvation-free bandwidth allocation at the same time. We also prove Adia's algorithm is two-approximate in terms of link utilization. Extensive simulation results on ns3 further show that Adia outperforms both per-flow mechanisms coflow schemes in terms of link utilization, and achieves similar coflow performance in comparison with the state-of-art coflow scheduling schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it