Effects of Fat Content and Source on Consumption Time in Two-Year-Old Quarter Horses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Twelve two-year-old quarter horses were used in this study to determine if the amount and source of fat supplement influenced consumption of grain. The experiment took place at Sam Houston State University’s Equine Center in Huntsville, Texas. Horses were allotted into one of three treatment groups. All horses received 1.5% BW in hay and 1% BW in grain twice per day throughout the study. Treatment group one received no additional top-dressed fat to the diet and was considered the no added oil (NO) treatment group. Treatment group two received 0.099 kg of additional top-dressed soybean oil (SO) to the diet. Treatment group three received 0.099 kg of additional top-dressed fish oil (FO) to the diet. Elapsed time for horses to consume the treatment rations was recorded at each feeding from d1 to d21. Results of this study indicate that over the entire 21-day treatment period, horses in the SO and FO treatment groups took longer (P 0.05) over the entire study. Similar trends were observed when comparing mean daily and weekly consumption times between treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".