MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Torsional Piezoelectric Strain in Monocrystalline Paratellurite

2016· article· en· W2551211829 on OpenAlexaff
Guillaume Boivin, Pierre Bélanger, Ricardo J. Zednik

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOptical and Acousto-Optic Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials sciencePiezoelectricityPiezoelectric coefficientMonocrystalline siliconOpticsOptoelectronicsComposite materialSiliconPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crystals of the 422 symmetry class exhibit interesting piezoelectric behavior, as their piezoelectric tensor has only a single non-zero coefficient, d123 = d14: such unique behavior has the potential to enable novel gyroscopic sensors and high-precision torsional MEMS actuators. Although alpha-phase tellurium dioxide (paratellurite, alpha-TeO2) is one of the few materials belonging to this symmetry class, this material has been primarily studied for its interesting optical properties. Indeed, a large uncertainty in the piezoelectric coefficient of paratellurite exists, with d123 measurements on single crystals ranging from 8.13 pC/N to 14.58 pC/N; this large uncertainty results from the difficulty in using conventional piezoelectric characterization techniques on paratellurite, and impedes adoption of this extraordinary material. The present study characterizes the piezoelectric behavior of this interesting material using two independent techniques, (1) a three dimensional laser Doppler interferometer system, and (2) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The experimental results are analyzed using numerical simulations for dynamic excitation conditions over a frequency range of 20 Hz to 200 kHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicOptical and Acousto-Optic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207