MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

An Unintended Benefit of Anabolic Steroid Use: Therapy of Hemophilia B Leiden.

2010· article· en· W2551279281 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Rimmer, Donald S. Houston, Matthew D. Seftel

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsCancerCare ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnabolic steroidMedicineStanozololFactor IXSurgeryInternal medicinePediatricsAnabolism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3661 Introduction: In Hemophilia B Leiden, administration of testosterone and anabolic steroids in pre-pubertal boys can raise endogenous Factor IX (FIX) to levels sufficient to prevent most hemorrhages. It is unknown whether this androgen responsiveness may occur even in the post-pubertal male. We present a case that unintentionally demonstrated this phenomenon. Case: A 29-year-old man with mild Hemophilia B (baseline Factor IX [FIX] level 12%) presented to the emergency department with acute left quadriceps swelling. He received 1,800 units (18 U/kg) of human factor IX concentrate and the following day FIX level was 80%. One day later, he was seen with persistent pain and swelling despite adequate factor replacement. The patient disclosed that he had been using intramuscular injections of the anabolic steroid stanozolol. On suspicion that the thigh swelling may represent abscess rather than hematoma, blood cultures were drawn and grew Staphylococcus aureus. He received appropriate antibacterial therapy and 1.5 liters of purulent material was drained from the thigh. Intriguingly, FIX level one month after discharge was still 61%. One year later, his FIX level had stabilized at 36%. Given the persistently elevated FIX level compared to baseline, the FIX gene was sequenced. Genotyping revealed a G to A transition at nucleotide -6 within the promoter region of the FIX gene. Mutations within nucleotides -34 to +19 of the 5′ region (Leiden-specific region) of the FIX promoter are associated with the Hemophilia B Leiden phenotype. This rare form of Hemophilia B improves following puberty. There is an androgen-response element (ARE) located at the -26 position of the FIX promoter, within the Leiden-specific region. The mechanism of recovery is not fully understood, but it is postulated that in the presence of androgen binding to the ARE, a normal FIX gene can be transcribed, thus overcoming the mutation causing the hemophilia phenotype prior to puberty. It has been shown that mutations involving the ARE do not resolve after puberty, which suggests an androgen responsive mechanism to the increase in FIX. Conclusion: This case raises the possibility of androgen-responsive increases in FIX that persist after puberty. We propose that a further rise in the FIX levels occurred as a result of exogenous exposure to pharmacologic concentrations of androgens in the post-pubertal period. This deliberate use of exogenous androgens carried the unintended benefit of abolishing the Hemophilia B phenotype. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemophilia Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→