MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551335517

Композиционно-структурные особенности сборника «Биография господина Шейха Зайнуллы»

2015· article· ru· W2551335517 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ilshat Ianbaev

Bibliographic record

VenueСовременные проблемы науки и образования · 2015
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Innovation and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObituaryEncyclopediaBiographyHistoryCharacter (mathematics)Quarter (Canadian coin)ClassicsSociologyLiteratureLawArt historyArtPolitical scienceArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author notes that appearance of collection under title the Biography of Mr Sheikh in drafting of Rizaetdin Fahretdinov in 1917, after death of prominent Bashkir religious thinker Zaya Rasuleva, it was a natural phenomenon and expected.Following tradition, adopted by Arab-Muslim East, R. Fahretdinov uses intended functionality obituary (vafiatname) in compiling encyclopedias historical and biographical nature, which summarizes whole way of life is determined by place of individual in history of culture. The principle of an obituary is an important structure-forming factor is not only bio-bibliographical encyclopedias, but also individual essays. Compliance with author-compiler of requirements of genre there is, for example, in a series of books of Asar. Under heading Famous people and great events of magazine Shuro principle obituary (vafiatname) are not complied with, we believe, for following reasons: firstly, as a result of educational movement national culture in last quarter of XIX – early XX centuries. It is under influence of Western tradition; Secondly, each essay is an autonomous character.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueСовременные проблемы науки и образованияSame topicEducation, Innovation and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207