Композиционно-структурные особенности сборника «Биография господина Шейха Зайнуллы»
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author notes that appearance of collection under title the Biography of Mr Sheikh in drafting of Rizaetdin Fahretdinov in 1917, after death of prominent Bashkir religious thinker Zaya Rasuleva, it was a natural phenomenon and expected.Following tradition, adopted by Arab-Muslim East, R. Fahretdinov uses intended functionality obituary (vafiatname) in compiling encyclopedias historical and biographical nature, which summarizes whole way of life is determined by place of individual in history of culture. The principle of an obituary is an important structure-forming factor is not only bio-bibliographical encyclopedias, but also individual essays. Compliance with author-compiler of requirements of genre there is, for example, in a series of books of Asar. Under heading Famous people and great events of magazine Shuro principle obituary (vafiatname) are not complied with, we believe, for following reasons: firstly, as a result of educational movement national culture in last quarter of XIX – early XX centuries. It is under influence of Western tradition; Secondly, each essay is an autonomous character.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".