MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551413520 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2005.1569034

Ideal lowpass filter technique to enhance harmonic spectrum estimation for power electronics circuits

2005· article· en· W2551413520 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectronic engineeringComputer scienceHarmonic analysisBandwidth (computing)Interpolation (computer graphics)Low-pass filterFast Fourier transformAnalogue filterHarmonicSpectral density estimationReconstruction filterAlgorithmFourier transformMathematicsDigital filterEngineeringRoot-raised-cosine filterTelecommunicationsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new and accurate method of harmonic analysis that permits to obtain high precision spectrum over wide range of bandwidth in order to mitigate power quality as well as EMI related problems. The proposed method is based on the estimation of intermediate points between the initial samples given by the available data acquisition system; therefore, the Fourier coefficients are estimated more precisely using the fast Fourier transform. As interpolation technique we chose digital to analog conversion with ideal lowpass filter for the reconstruction of the analog signal. The proposed method is tested on experimental signals and validated by adding known harmonic components to the measured signal. The obtained results are compared to traditional FFT as well as spline interpolation, and linear interpolation techniques. The performance of the proposed method and its superiority over the known techniques is discussed and the possible sources of errors are identified

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it