MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Treatment of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) with a Modified DFCI Pediatric Regimen - The Princess Margaret Experience.

2006· article· en· W2551484494 on OpenAlexaffabout
John M. Storring, Joseph Brandwein, Vikas Gupta, Andre C. Schuh, Aaron D. Schimmer, Karen Yee, Richard A. Wells, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Hans A. Messner, Wei Xu, Mark D. Minden

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineImatinib mesylateVincristineAcute lymphocytic leukemiaInternal medicineSurgeryRegimenChemotherapyGastroenterologyImatinibLeukemiaCyclophosphamideLymphoblastic Leukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Between June 2000 and December 2004, 68 adult patients with newly diagnosed ALL were treated at Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto, Canada using a modified Dana Farber Cancer Institute pediatric ALL protocol (DFCI 91-01). This protocol includes a remission induction phase, a CNS prophylaxis phase with intrathecal chemotherapy and 12 Gy cranial irradiation, a 30-week intensification phase, and a 72-week maintenance phase. Since 2002, bcr-abl+ patients received concurrent therapy with imatinib mesylate. Before 2002, all patients in CR1 were referred for allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) if a suitable matched sibling donor was identified (n=11); after 2002, only high-risk patients were referred for alloSCT (n=14). In addition bcr-abl+ and t(4:11) patients were considered for matched unrelated donor alloSCT. Median age was 34.5 years (range, 17–61 years). Sixteen (23.5%) patients were bcr-abl+ and 13 (19.1%) pre-B with WBC > 30. Ten of 16 (62.5%) of the bcr-abl+ patients received concurrent imatinib mesylate; 11 of 16 (69%) of these subsequently underwent alloSCT. The complete remission (CR) rate was 85.4% (58/68), with a 5.9% induction death rate. CNS prophylaxis was administered to 54 patients and was well tolerated. Fifty-seven patients proceeded to therapy in the intensification phase, which consisted of vincristine (VCR) 2 mg × 10 doses, L-asparaginase (l-asp) 12,500 IU/m2 weekly × 30 doses, doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 × 7 doses, 6-mercaptopurine, dexamethasone and methotrexate. Thirty-four patients completed this phase, while 18 patients had an abbreviated course of intensification before proceeding to alloSCT. Major side effects during the intensification phase included grade 3–4 neutropenia (63%), peripheral neuropathy (40%), thrombosis (17.5%) and central venous catheter infection (18.2%). Intensification was administered on an outpatient basis with 12/57 (21%) requiring hospitalization for any reason. Maintenance therapy was given to 32 patients and was well tolerated. At a median follow-up of 2.7 years (range, 0.05–5.8 years), both median overall survival (OS) and relapse free survival (RFS) were 4.9 years. Among non-transplanted patients (n=44), Kaplan-Meier 3-year OS and RFS were 65.5% and 77.3%, respectively with most deaths occurring in induction or from progressive leukemia in primary non-responders. For the entire group, younger age (< 25 years) was associated with improved OS and RFS (p= 0.03) whereas bcr-abl positivity was not. Due to neuropathy, vinblastine (VBL) was substituted for VCR in 13/33 (39.4%) patients during intensification without affecting RFS and OS (p=0.22). Of the 34 patients who completed intensification without relapse, those who received >80% of the targeted l-asp dose had a significantly longer OS (p=0.02) and RFS (p=0.04). These results demonstrate the feasibility of administering the pediatric DFCI protocol to adults up to the age of 61 years with acceptable toxicity. As with the DFCI pediatric experience (Blood2001; 97(5): 1211-8), the ability to deliver >80% of the targeted l-asparaginase dose during the intensification phase appears to produce improved efficacy. Longer follow-up will be needed to further characterize the anti-leukemic efficacy of this regimen in adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207