MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551584922 · doi:10.1115/ipc2016-64212

FortisBC 36-Inch High Pressure Line Isolation Using Double Block and Bleed Technology

2016· article· en· W2551584922 on OpenAlexaffabout
Neil Bolger, Kyle Whiteis, Raghav Marwaha, Jim Treece

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring and Maintenance; Materials and Joining · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsBC Research (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTimelineFootprintPipeline (software)Block (permutation group theory)Isolation (microbiology)BleedComputer scienceEngineeringBusinessMechanical engineeringGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the benefit of using single-tap double block and bleed (DBB) technology to isolate large diameter (24-inch and 36-inch) natural gas transmission lines during tie-in of a pig launcher and receiver in Surrey, British Columbia, Canada. The pipeline, which is owned by FortisBC, is the only source of supply for the city of Coquitlam, the Vancouver Island system, and a major power generation facility. As such, shutting down the line was not an option. Instead, the project required a bypass. However, the footprint of the jobsite was too small for a traditional bypass. In addition, the jobsite’s location adjacent to a major highway and a tight timeline meant that first time isolation success was mandatory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring and Maintenance; Materials and JoiningSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207