MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551586692 · doi:10.1115/ipc2016-64509

The Effect of Niobium on Austenite Decomposition in Line Pipe Steels

2016· article· en· W2551586692 on OpenAlexaff
Isaac Dalton Gordon Robinson, Thomas Garcin, Warren J. Poole, Matthias Militzer

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring and Maintenance; Materials and Joining · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceNiobiumMetallurgyAusteniteMicrostructureGrain sizeAlloy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Niobium is a common micro-alloying addition in high-strength low-alloy (HSLA) steels primarily to add strength to the final product. Detailed quantification of the various effects of niobium is critical for understanding the microstructure evolution in the heat affected zone (HAZ) of welds. Laser ultrasonics for metallurgy (LUMet) was used to measure austenite grain growth kinetics in two experimental HSLA steels during continuous heating. For higher heating rates that are of relevance for the HAZ, grain growth during heating is negligible and grain size is determined during the brief time at the peak temperature. Thermal histories were designed based on these tests to produce a variety of microstructures relevant for various positions in the HAZ i.e. coarse and fine grain regions. It was found that the dissolution of niobium carbonitrides has a strong effect on austenite decomposition, particularily in the case of large austenite grain sizes. Nb in solution significantly depresses transformation temperatures in refinement of bainitic microstructures, significantly increasing the hardness in the coarse grained HAZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring and Maintenance; Materials and JoiningSame topicMicrostructure and Mechanical Properties of SteelsFrench-language works237,207