MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551661984 · doi:10.1097/jfn.0000000000000135

Editorial Reflections on the International Association of Forensic Nurses' 2016 International Conference on Forensic Science and Practice

2016· article· en· W2551661984 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cindy Peternelj‐Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Forensic Nursing · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForensic nursingForensic scienceForensic psychiatryLibrary sciencePsychologyMedical educationMedicinePsychiatryComputer scienceVeterinary medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Author Affiliations: College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan. The author declares no conflict of interest. Correspondence: Cindy Peternelj-Taylor RN, BScN, MSc, DF-IAFN, College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, 4214-104 Clinic Place, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 2Z4. E-mail: [email protected]. Received October 25, 2016; accepted for publication October 25, 2016.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Forensic NursingSame topicSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207