MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551864884 · doi:10.1002/mop.30227

Wideband and high‐gain EBG resonator antenna based on dual layer PRS

2016· article· en· W2551864884 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelhalim Chaabane, F. Djahli, Hussein Attia, Lamine Mohamed Abdelghani, Tayeb A. Denidni

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWidebandAntenna gainBandwidth (computing)High-gain antennaResonatorMicrowaveAntenna measurementPhysicsOpticsOptoelectronicsAntenna factorElectrical engineeringEngineeringAntenna (radio)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT A wideband and high‐gain electromagnetic band‐gap resonator antenna for X‐band operation is presented in this paper. A dual‐layer partially reflective surface with a wide frequency band from 8.3 to 11 GHz is proposed to enhance the 3‐dB gain bandwidth of a simple planar antenna. The measured results indicate that the proposed antenna possesses a relative 3‐dB gain bandwidth of about 33.33%, from 7.95 to 11.13 GHz, with a maximum gain of 13.57 dBi. Moreover, the measured impedance bandwidth is about 35.53%, from 7.8 to 11.17 GHz, which fairly covers the 3‐dB gain bandwidth. Hence, the proposed structure surpasses conventional techniques for widening the 3‐dB gain bandwidth. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 59:98–101, 2017

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207