MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2551906949

Emotional Well-Being in Children with New- Onset Epilepsy

2016· article· en· W2551906949 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shane W. Goodwin

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyPsychosocialPsychologyModerationQuality of life (healthcare)MediationLogistic regressionMultinomial logistic regressionCohortClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatryMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research suggests increased risk for adverse psychosocial outcomes and poor health-related quality of life and emotional well-being (EWB) in children with epilepsy compared to their healthy peers. The factors associated with poor EWB and the course of EWB in these children remains unclear. The objectives of this study were to: investigate the relationship between epilepsy-related and family factors and children’s EWB two years after the diagnosis of epilepsy; identify the average group trajectory of EWB in children with newly-diagnosed epilepsy over the first two years; and investigate whether we can identify subgroups of children with epilepsy that can be better represented with yet unidentified unique trajectories to describe their course of EWB, rather than using a single homogeneous group trajectory to represent all children.\nData came from a multi-centre prospective cohort study of children with newly-diagnosed epilepsy from across Canada (Health-Related Quality of Life in Children with Epilepsy Study; HERQULES, n=373). EWB was measured using the Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire. Multiple regression assessed the relationship between epilepsy-related factors and EWB and tested possible mediation or moderation effects of family factors. Latent growth modeling and multinomial logistic regression was used to identify trajectories of EWB, the factors associated with each trajectory, and predictors of group membership to a particular trajectory.\nBehavioural problems, family functioning, family demands, and family resources were associated with poor EWB two-years post-diagnosis. Parental depressive symptoms were partially mediated by family functioning and by family demands. Family resources played a dual mediator/moderator role, moderating the relationship between severity of epilepsy and EWB.\nTwo linear trajectories were identified, with the same set of factors associated with baseline EWB for both trajectories, but factors differed in their association with EWB across time for the two trajectories. The level of severity of epilepsy and family resources predicted a child’s membership to a particular trajectory.\nPoor EWB in children with epilepsy is associated with several epilepsy-related and family factors. After a diagnosis of epilepsy, family factors appear to be the most important influences on changes in EWB over time so efforts to strengthen the family environment may warrant attention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)→Same topicEpilepsy research and treatment→French-language works237,207→