MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2552009899 · doi:10.2527/jam2016-0486

0486 Development of a genetic marker panel for ketosis in dairy cattle

2016· article· en· W2552009899 on OpenAlexaffabout
V. Kroezen, F. Miglior, Flávio S. Schenkel, J. Squires

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCandidate geneGenome-wide association studySNPBiologyGeneticsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismKetosisGenetic associationGeneGenotypeEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the transition period high-yielding dairy cattle are susceptible to ketosis, a metabolic disease which has negative impacts on the health, fertility and milk production of the cow. Genetic selection of animals resistant to developing ketosis is a potential solution to the economic losses faced by producers, as well as the reduced herd health and welfare associated with this disease. Genetic evaluations for ketosis, a health trait with low heritability, would benefit from the additional information provided by genetic markers. The objective of this study is to identify novel single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) within candidate genes for ketosis to be incorporated into a custom marker panel. Investigating candidate genes provides the opportunity to discover SNP with a functional role that are not currently included on commercially-available marker panels. A list of 123 candidate genes, selected based on biological relevance, were selected for in silico investigation; this includes genes which encode key enzymes and regulatory factors involved in metabolic pathways, genes that have been shown to be differentially expressed in ketotic animals, and genes that have been proposed by genome-wide association studies (GWAS). A preliminary GWAS from our group identified 462 SNP from high-density genotypes that are associated with de-regressed estimated breeding values for ketosis. These SNP were mapped to genes involved in pathways that were expected to be involved in ketosis (i.e., PPAR signaling pathway, CoA biosynthesis), as well as unexpected (i.e., T and B cell receptor signaling, apoptosis). Within the candidate genes, putative SNP were identified by aligning sequence data from online cDNA libraries with the gene reference sequence. The variant calling program, Sequencher 4.9, was used to identify SNP and their corresponding amino acid substitutions. SNP were prioritized for inclusion in the panel based on their Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant prediction score, to select polymorphisms which would most likely alter the function of the encoded protein. A set of 1081 SNP were incorporated onto a custom low-density panel. To our knowledge, this is the first custom panel composed of markers found in candidate genes that are specific to ketosis. The second phase of this project will use this panel to genotype several thousand cows from herds originating from Quebec, Canada; these data to be collected spring 2016.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock→French-language works237,207→