MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2552125671 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v8n6p45

Computable Error Bounds for a Class of Boundary Value Problems: a Coefficients Perturbation Approach

2016· article· en· W2552125671 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohamed K. El Daou, Ahmad R. Al-Hamdan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods for differential equations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsPerturbation (astronomy)Boundary value problemBoundary valuesMathematical analysisApplied mathematicsUpper and lower boundsDifferential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concerned with computing upper and lower bounds for the error committed when some boundary value problems are approximated by means of numerical techniques based on the Coefficients Perturbation Methods. These computed bounds are expressed in terms of the perturbations introduced in the differential equation and in the prescribed boundary conditions associated with it. Numerical examples demonstrating the sharpness of our results are given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.292
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicNumerical methods for differential equationsFrench-language works237,207