MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2552131042 · doi:10.2527/jam2016-1744

1744 Effects of different sources and routes of administration of copper and vitamins A and D on piglets gut microbiota

2016· article· en· W2552131042 on OpenAlexaff
Guylaine Talbot, Martin Lessard, Étienne Yergeau, Nathalie Gagnon, Luca Lo Verso, Jérôme Lapointe, Nathalie Bissonnette, Danyel Bueno Dalto, Bazoumana Ouattara, Frédéric Guay, J. J. Matte

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVitaminRetinolFecesMicronutrientGut floraBiologyLitterLactationIleumAnimal sciencePhysiologyProbioticFood scienceEndocrinologyChemistryBiochemistryMicrobiologyPregnancyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Placental and colostral transfers of copper and vitamins A and D micronutrients from dams to neonates are limited in pig species (Matte et al., 2014, JAS 92-Suppl. 2:153). The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of different perinatal micronutrient supplementation strategies on piglets' gut microbiota. Within each litter from 5 sows, 10 newborn piglets were allocated to one of the following combinations of sources and routes of micronutrient administrations: oral vitamin D3, retinol-acetate and CuSO4 (T1); oral 25-OH-vitamin D3, β-carotene and Cu-yeast (T2); exposure to UVB light (20 min every second day), oral retinol-palmitate and Cu-gluconate (T3); intramuscular vitamin D3 and retinol-propionate and oral Cu-acetate (T4); oral saline (CTL). Oral or intramuscular provisions corresponded to 12 mg of copper and 70 and 12 MIU of vitamins A and D, respectively. This design was repeated with 5 other sows fed daily extra supplements of 25-OH-vitamin D3 (4 MIU), β-carotene (24 MIU) and Cu-yeast (45 mg) from 90 d of gestation to 21 d of lactation. At 21 d of age, feces were collected and piglets were weaned. At 23 d of age, 5 repetitions of a combination of sow and piglet factorial treatments were sacrificed and feces and content from mid-jejunum, ileum, mid-colon, and rectum were collected to characterize gut microbiota. Bacterial communities were analyzed by sequencing the V3-V4 regions of 16S rRNA genes on an Illumina MiSeq. Bioinformatic analyses were performed on our internal data analysis pipeline and statistics were performed in R. The analysis of bacterial community composition at the class level revealed that sow supplementation significantly increased the relative abundance of Bacilli in feces at d 21 (P = 0.04) but not at d 23. Gut microbiota diversity significantly differed (P = 0.03) according to supplemental treatments provided to piglets. However there was no piglet treatment effect on gut microbiota based on PCoA analyses. The Shannon diversity of jejunal and ileal microbiota was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased when supplementation was given to sows. Sow supplementation also significantly increased Bacilli in both jejunum and ileum (P < 0.001, both). The study demonstrated that piglet gut microbiota can be modulated by daily extra supplementation of vitamins A and D and organic copper to sows during late pregnancy and lactation periods. Further studies are thus warranted to study mechanisms of action explaining the impact of such maternal micronutrient supplementation on bacterial colonization in piglets gut.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology→French-language works237,207→