MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Discrete-time parallel robot motion control using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system based on improved subtractive clustering

2016· article· en· W2552134555 on OpenAlexaff
Qun Ren, Pascal Bigras

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)PID controllerComputer scienceAdaptive controlAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemFuzzy control systemNonlinear systemControl engineeringTorqueFuzzy logicArtificial intelligenceEngineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses a high precision discrete-time model-free PID adaptive neuro-fuzzy logic motion controller in case the physical models that describe a robot are not known. The advantage of this kind controller is that it uses an improved subtractive clustering technique to obtain the structure of the system model in order to ensure the high accuracy of the intelligent control. Moreover, the information used is directly from the nonlinear system response without the knowledge of the robot physical parameters and complex models. Furthermore, the controller is designed in discrete-time domain for allowing its implementation. To conceive this kind intelligent control, first adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system with an improved subtractive clustering computing is used to accomplish the integration of information of joint angular displacement and velocity for torque identification. The learning datasets are generated by using a discrete-time PID feedback control, which desired position is sufficiently rich to ensure that the learning system would include most characteristics of the nonlinear dynamics of the system. Then a discrete-time fuzzy feed forward control, combined with a conventional PID and the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, is designed for the mechanism motion control. Simulation results from numerical experiment on a 4-bar planar parallel mechanism show the proposed controller can reduce joint position and velocity tracking errors with higher accuracy and higher reliability than a traditional PID controller and a computed torque controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207