MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2552182597 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.075149

Anisotropy induces non-Fermi-liquid behavior and nematic magnetic order in three-dimensional Luttinger semimetals

2017· article· en· W2552182597 on OpenAlexafffund
Igor Boettcher, Igor F. Herbut

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTopological Materials and Phenomena
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsAnisotropyLuttinger liquidLiquid crystalFermi liquid theoryRenormalization groupElectronQuantum mechanicsSuperconductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interplay of electronic correlations and spin-orbit coupling results in a rich phenomenology in semimetals with linear or quadratic band touching points. Remarkably, the associated low-energy physics and ground-state properties can often be described by effective field theories with enlarged symmetries such as rotation or Lorentz invariance. Realistic band structures of actual materials, however, are typically anisotropic and thus only allow for cubic rotation invariance. Here, the authors study the influence of anisotropy on the ground state of three-dimensional semimetals described by the Luttinger Hamiltonian, which captures the quadratic band touching present in HgTe, the pyrochlore iridates ${R}_{2}$Ir${}_{2}$O${}_{7}$, or strongly correlated half-Heusler compounds such as YPtBi. They highlight that a sufficient amount of anisotropy can induce qualitatively new ground states in these systems, namely a scale-invariant non-Fermi liquid state, or different octupolar tensor orders that break time-reversal invariance. The latter configurations share features of magnets and nematic order, so one could call them ``nemagnetic''. The authors clarify their very natural interpretation as all-in-all-out or spin ice configurations for electrons in the pyrochlore iridates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicTopological Materials and PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207