Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Em 2007-2008, o governo quebequense criou uma Comissão «sobre as práticas de conciliação relacionadas às diferenças culturais». A Comissão Bouchard-Taylor passou a questionar qual seria a relação entre os quebequenses «autênticos» com as comunidades oriundas de uma imigração recente, cujos membros ostentam suas crenças religiosas e tentam, às vezes, impô-las juridicamente Como a questão não foi regulamentada por essa comissão, hoje os quebequenses estão divididos quanto a isso. Entre os partidários da «laicidade aberta» e os da «laicidade estrita», como reagirá o Estado?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- En 2007-2008, le Gouvernement québécois a mandaté une Commission «sur les pratiques d’accommodement reliées aux différences culturelles». La Commission Bouchard-Taylor en est venu à se demander quel est le rapport des Québécois «de souche» aux communautés issues d’une récente immigration, dont les membres affichent leurs croyances religieuses et tentent parfois de les imposer juridiquement? La question n’ayant pas été réglée par cette commission, les intellectuels québécois sont aujourd’hui divisés sur la question. Entre les tenants de la «laïcité ouverte» et ceux de la «laïcité stricte», comment l’État réagira-t-il?---Artigo em francês
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it