Savoirs et pratiques dans la formation à l’enseignement des genres écrits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article prsente les fondements thoriques d'un cours labor dans le cadre de la formation initiale des enseignants de franais au secondaire l'Universit Laval de Qubec. Nous prsenterons les fondements thoriques de notre dispositif de formation qui s'inscrit dans la perspective de l'interactionnisme sociodiscursif, dans lequel le concept de genre discursif est central. Utilis de manire itrative dans deux cours obligatoires de didactique de l' criture de 45 heures chacun, ce dispositif a t adapt au fil des ans dans le but d'articuler l' enseignement de savoirs thoriques sur l' criture avec des pratiques permettant de dvelopper les habilets des futurs enseignants planifier, produire, rviser et rcrire divers textes de genres non littraires qu'ils auront enseigner. titre d'illustration du cadre thorique prsent, nous dcrirons les tapes d'une dmarche de formation l' enseignement du texte d' opinion argumente pour des lves de 5e anne du secondaire (16-17 ans).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".