Formant trajectories in the realization of 3 Malayalam rhotics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malayalam has a typologically rare set of three rhotic consonants—an alveolar trill, an alveolar tap, and a retroflex/postalveolar approximant. The first one is described as velarized, while the other two are somewhat palatalized. Previous acoustic work by Punnoose et al. [Phonetica 70, 274-297 (2013)] has established that the contrast can be differentiated by formant values around the constriction, as well as at the midpoint of adjacent vowels. Less clear, however, is the temporal extent of these formant differences and their overall dynamics. In this study, we analyze three rhotics produced by 10 male Malayalam speakers. Measurements of F1-F4 were taken at 10 points throughout the VCV interval and subjected to a series of Smoothing Spline ANOVAs. The results revealed differences in F2 (tap, approximant > trill) and F3 (tap, trill > approximant) among the rhotics extended through most of the preceding and following vowel duration, while differences in F1 (trill > tap, approximant) were less extensive. While similar to the tap in its F2 trajectory, the approximant showed a more abrupt fall during the following vowel, seemingly indicative of a rapid tongue posture change at the release. [Work supported by SSHRC.]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".