MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2552396576 · doi:10.1007/s41062-016-0047-2

Unsaturated shear strength properties of a compacted expansive soil from Regina, Canada

2016· article· en· W2552396576 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovative Infrastructure Solutions · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Regina
KeywordsExpansive clayGeotechnical engineeringCompactionCohesion (chemistry)Materials scienceSaturation (graph theory)ShrinkageVoid ratioSuctionComposite materialSoil waterGeologySoil scienceMathematicsChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The main objective of this research was to investigate the unsaturated shear strength properties of the compacted expansive soil from Regina (Saskatchewan, Canada). Laboratory investigations on a typical expansive clay (liquid limit of 77% and plastic limit of 27%) were conducted using both saturated and unsaturated samples. Results indicated that the SWCC had one AEV of 10 kPa for w and θ and two AEVs for S : 10 and 7000 kPa due to drainage through inter-clod pores and soil matrix, respectively. Most of the shrinkage occurred around S ≈ 80%, whereas desaturation before and after this value was associated with small changes in void ratio. Likewise, the peak stress on the dry side of optimum along with the initial gradient of the stress-displacement curve of up to 250 kPa and 13,350 kPa/mm, respectively, decreased to 170 kPa and 5670 kPa/mm on the wet side of optimum. The variation in cohesion followed the compaction curve and increased from 24 kPa on dry side to 65 kPa at optimum and then decreased to 33 kPa on wet side. The friction angle followed an L-shaped trend and decreased from 44° on dry side to 29° at optimum and to 27° on wet side. Finally, the S-shaped ϕ b curve was in agreement with compaction characteristics and the SWCC. The ϕ b curve comprised 1° increase on dry side (and approaching residual suction), 12° increase around optimum (between AEV and residual suction), and 2° increase on wet side that tended to approach ϕ near saturation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it