Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the Roman Catholic community, the Second Vatican Council inaugurated a notable paradigm shift, especially in the ecumenical movement. Joining earlier efforts of the Orthodox and Reformation churches, Catholics established official theological consultations with other churches. Since then there have appeared collaborative studies on the teachings of the Council and the imperative of unity movements. In addition to these studies, individual scholars have analyzed afresh the origins of ecclesial divergences and the paths to reconciliation. This article provides a bibliographical overview of these two genres of publications, especially those appearing in Canada and the United States. Because of the emergence of “receptive ecumenism” and “unity in diversity,” church leaders and scholars are hopeful that, in the near future, the divisions that have marked Christianity for centuries will gradually be healed. Attention is also paid to university centres such as Leuven, Bologna, and Durham that have been prominent in research, including collection of archival materials and publication of conciliar diaries by now deceased council participants. Also provided are lists of major international conferences in Europe and America that have explored reasons for implementation of and even resistance to the teachings of Vatican ii.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".