MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficacy Analysis From Phase I Study of Lorvotuzumab Mertansine (IMGN901), Used as Monotherapy, In Patients with Heavily Pre-Treated CD56-Positive Multiple Myeloma - A Preliminary Efficacy Analysis

2010· article· en· W2552542954 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Asher Chanan‐Khan, Jeffrey L. Wolf, Juan Garcia, Mecide Gharibo, Sundar Jagannath, Debbie Manfredi, Taimur Sher, Cindi Martin, S. Zildjian, James J. O’Leary, Robert Vescio

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMultiple myelomaInternal medicinePharmacokineticsAdverse effectPhases of clinical researchRefractory (planetary science)CohortToxicityChemotherapyCancerTolerabilityNauseaGastroenterologySurgeryOncologyPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1962 Background: Lorvotuzumab mertansine, also known as IMGN901 (huN901-DM1/BB-10901) is a novel anticancer agent consisting of a potent cytotoxic maytansinoid, DM1, attached to a CD56-binding monoclonal antibody, lorvotuzumab, using an engineered linker. Once bound to CD56 on a cancer cell and internalized, the DM1 is released to kill the cancer cell. Greater than 70% of multiple myeloma (MM) cases have surface expression of CD56. Safety information from the dose-escalation phase of this study was reported (ASH 114:2883, 2009) as the study was entering its expansion phase. Objectives: This study is designed to determine the MTD, pharmacokinetics (PK), and activity of IMGN901 used as monotherapy in patients with CD56+ MM, with additional information on its safety and efficacy to be obtained from its expansion phase. Methods: Patients with CD56+ relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM receive a single IV infusion of IMGN901 weekly for 2 consecutive weeks every 3 weeks. During the dose-escalation phase, patients were enrolled into each dose level in cohorts of 3, with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) triggering cohort expansion. Once the MTD was determined, an expansion cohort was opened to further characterize the safety and efficacy of IMGN901 administered at its MTD. Results: Thirty-seven CD56+ MM patients have received IMGN901 at doses ranging from 40 to 140 mg/m2/week with 19 patients treated at the MTD of 112 mg/m2. Most of these 37 patients had been treated with 6 or more chemotherapy regimens prior to study entry. Among the 28 evaluable patients, 13 received IMGN901 treatment for more than three months, with 2 remaining on treatment for more than a year. Five of these patients achieved an objective response (OR) according to the European Bone Marrow Transplant Criteria – 2 partial responses and 3 minimal responses. The clinical benefit rate approximates 46%. Three patients have experienced four grade 3 drug-related toxicities that are considered at least possibly related to IMGN901: fatigue, renal failure, weakness, and absence of deep tendon reflexes. No grade 4 drug-related toxicities have been reported. No patients have demonstrated a humoral response against either the antibody or DM1 component of IMGN901. Conclusion: In this population of patients with heavily pretreated MM, IMGN901 demonstrates an ability to provide sustained clinical benefit and tolerability. This warrants its continued investigation as monotherapy and supports its investigation as part of a combination regimen. Disclosures: Jagannath: Millennium: Honoraria; Orthobiotec (Canada): Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Onyx Pharma: Honoraria; Proteolix: Honoraria; Imedex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medicom World Wide: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Optum Health Education: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PER Group: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zildjian:ImmunoGen, Inc.: Employment. O'Leary:ImmunoGen, Inc.: Employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207