MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2552669687 · doi:10.1109/piers.2016.7735708

Optical spring sensing of single molecules

2016· article· en· W2552669687 on OpenAlexaff
Wenyan Yu, Wei Jiang, Qiang Lin, Tao Lű

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMechanical and Optical Resonators
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHarmonic oscillatorWhispering-gallery waveOpticsLaserQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. It is well known that the eigen frequency (f) of a harmonic oscillator is determined by the oscillator effective mass (meff) and spring constant (keff) according to the Hook's law f = 1/2π √(keff/mejj). An optical whispering gallery microcavity, when the wavelength of the injected light coincides the cavity resonance, establishes tremendous amount of light circulating along its equator. For an ultra-high quality factor microcavity, the circulating light exerts an optical force strong enough to turn the cavity to an opto-mechanical oscillator with an injected light power as low as several milliwatts in an aqueous environment. Following the Hook's law, a small particle binding on the surface of the cavity increases the effective mass, thus changes the corresponding frequency of the oscillator. Researchers have shown that this change of the frequency can be interrogated by monitoring the light escaping from the cavity. This makes the cavity a particle detector with pico-gram resolution. Here, we show that due to the forced oscillator nature of a silica microsphere, the binding particle also alters the rigidity or spring constant of the cavity through the tuning of the optical force. Such effect produces a shift of the oscillation frequency orders of magnitude larger than that induced from the addition of the particle mass. Using this principle, single 10-nm-raidus silica beads was detected and Bovine serum albumin (BSA) molecule with molecular weight of 66 kDalton was also observed at a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 16.8. The experiment predicts a minimum detection sensitivity of 3.9 kDalton with an SNR above unity. As the resolution of this technique is limited by optical and effective mechanical quality factor, further improvement predicts a sub-atomic resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0680.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMechanical and Optical ResonatorsFrench-language works237,207