MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2552703523 · doi:10.5935/0004-2749.20160082

Crosslinking enters public health armamentarium in Brazil

2016· editorial· en· W2552703523 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wallace Chamon

Bibliographic record

VenueArquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia · 2016
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Health in Brazil
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptometryPublic healthMedicineBusinessOphthalmologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brazilian health system, named SUS (Sistema nico de Sade or Unique Health System) was created in 1990, based on constitutional principles set in 1988 and, in its basic values, states that health is a fundamental human right, and the State must provide the necessary conditions for it Six years after being cleared by Brazilian government as a valid medical treatment Other agencies, such as Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee (OHTAC), have made similar suggestions a few years ago

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0180.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArquivos Brasileiros de OftalmologiaSame topicPublic Health in BrazilFrench-language works237,207