MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2552851283 · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000003075

Timing of Presentation of Pediatric Compartment Syndrome and Its Microsurgical Implication: A Retrospective Review

2016· review· en· W2552851283 on OpenAlexaff
Natalia Ziolkowski, Leanne Zive, Emily S. Ho, Ronald M. Zuker

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMuscle and Compartmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsCanadian Society of Plastic SurgeonsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryDecompressionForearmPresentation (obstetrics)FasciotomyRetrospective cohort studyMicrosurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pediatric forearm compartment syndrome can lead to severe functional disability. Although it is known that earlier presentation with decompression leads to better outcomes, it is not known when presentation after injury leads to significant loss of function requiring microsurgical intervention. The authors describe the rate of microsurgical reconstruction after pediatric forearm compartment syndrome as related to timing of presentation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of pediatric patients with forearm compartment syndrome between January 1, 2000, and March 22, 2013, after a traumatic upper extremity injury. Demographic information, cause, time to decompression, complications, and functional outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients aged between 2 and 16 years (8.97 ± 4.12 years) met inclusion criteria. The majority (74 percent) were boys. The right upper extremity was predominantly involved (54 percent), with a predilection for ulnar fractures (66 percent). Fasciotomies were completed for 32 patients (91 percent). Two patients had no decompression (6 percent) because of late presentation. The average time to fasciotomy was less than 12 hours after injury in 16 patients (46 percent), 12 to 48 hours in 15 patients (43 percent), and greater than 48 hours in four patients (11 percent). Complications (63 percent) included nerve injury (40 percent), skin graft (37 percent), scar revision (11 percent), and long flexor tightness requiring serial casting (17 percent). Forearm muscle necrosis requiring microsurgical reconstructive surgery with a gracilis muscle flap occurred in two patients (6 percent). Increased time to decompression was statistically associated with long flexor tightness and gracilis reconstructive surgery. CONCLUSION: Presentation after 48 hours resulted in significant functional deficits requiring reconstructive surgery (gracilis muscle flap reconstruction) or long-term conservative management (serial casting).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicMuscle and Compartmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207