MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2552872440 · doi:10.29173/cais331

Covered Beverages Now Allowed: Public Libraries and Book Superstores

2013· article· fr· W2552872440 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceDemocracyEconomic rentHumanitiesReading (process)Public informationLibrary sciencePublic administrationArtPoliticsEconomicsLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unobtrusive observation was used to investigate what people do while at public libraries and how these behaviours are similar to or different from what commonly happens in book superstores. Public libraries emerge as being more diverse, providing more access to information and reading materials, and functioning as a democratic and tolerant public gathering place.Une observation discrète a été effectuée pour étudier ce que les individus font lorsqu’ils fréquentent les bibliothèques publiques et comment ces comportements sont semblables ou différents de ceux généralement observés dans les librairies à grande surface. Les bibliothèques publiques paraissent plus diversifiées, offrent un meilleur accès à l'information et au matériel de lecture et fonctionnent comme un lieu de rassemblement public démocratique et tolérant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.083
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it