MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2553016849 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2009-0025

ON THE FORCES AND STROUHAL NUMBERS IN THE LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER WAKES OF TWO CYLINDERS IN TANDEM

2009· article· en· W2553016849 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tinghui Zheng, Shiu Keung Tang, Baoling Fei

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrouhal numberReynolds numberWakeMechanicsAerodynamicsCylinderPhysicsAerodynamic forceTandemMathematicsClassical mechanicsGeometryTurbulenceEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The flow around two circular cylinders of equal diameter in tandem arrangement was investigated numerically using the finite volume method in the present study. The code was validated by comparison with previous works at the Reynolds number of 200. A systematic investigation of the relationships of Strouhal number and the aerodynamic forces with cylinder separation and Reynolds number was done. Results demonstrate not only the important combined effects cylinder separation and Reynolds number on the wake aerodynamics, but also on the relative strengths of the forces acting on the two cylinders (both mean and fluctuations)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207