MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identification and Characterization of New Microrna Biomarkers and Target Genes in Drug-Insensitive CD34+ CML Stem/Progenitor Cells Using Global Comparative RNA-Seq Analyses

2015· article· en· W2553044273 on OpenAlexaff
Hanyang Lin, Jonathan Zeng, Katharina Rothe, Jens Rüschmann, Oleh I. Petriv, Kieran O’Neill, Tobias Maetzig, David J. H. F. Knapp, Ryan R. Brinkman, İnanç Birol, Donna L. Forrest, Carl L. Hansen, Connie J. Eaves, R. Keith Humphries, Xiaoyan Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmicroRNACD34Stem cellProgenitor cellBiologyCancer researchHaematopoiesisMiRBaseGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Therapeutic targeting of BCR-ABL with selective ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has led to a significant survival benefit for early phase CML. However, TKI monotherapies are rarely curative, with persistence of leukemic stem cells, emergence of resistance and relapses remaining as challenges. To identify differentially expressed and new miRNAs in CD34+ CML stem/progenitor cells that might serve as potential biomarkers and/or therapeutic targets, we have performed Illumina Deep Sequencing to obtain absolute miRNA expression profiles of highly purified CD34+ cells obtained at newly diagnosed stage from six CML patients. Three of the patients were classified retrospectively, after imatinib (IM) therapy, as IM-responders and three as IM-nonresponders. CD34+ cells isolated from five normal bone marrow (NBM) samples were similarly analyzed as controls. Bioconductor DESeq2 analysis revealed 63 differentially expressed miRNAs between CML and NBM samples (adjusted P<0.05). Most differentially expressed miRNAs identified were down-regulated in CML compared to NBM, while 17 were up-regulated. Interestingly, 12 miRNAs were found to be differentially expressed between the IM-responders and IM-nonresponders. In addition, 34 novel miRNAs were identified in the CD34+ CML stem/progenitor cells. We next validated the sequencing data in a larger cohort of samples. CD34+ cells from IM-responders (n=12), IM-nonresponders (n=10) and normal individuals (n=11) were analyzed using a high-throughput qPCR microfluidics device. These studies confirmed the differential expression in CD34+ CML cells of 32 of the 63 miRNAs (adjusted P<0.05), including an increased level of oncomirs miR-155 and miR-17-92, and a decreased level of tumor suppressors miR-145, miR-151, and miR-452. Importantly, significant changes in some of these miRNAs were detected in CD34+ cells from CML patients (n=60) after three months of nilotinib (NL) treatment compared to the same patient samples before the treatment: expression of 18 miRNAs were normalized after NL therapy, whereas 10 showed little change. To further identify potential miRNA target genes, RNA-seq analysis was performed on the same RNA samples to correlate miRNA profiles with corresponding mRNA expression changes. Bioconductor RmiR analysis was performed to match miRNA target genes whose expression was inversely correlated with the expression of deregulated miRNAs based on three of six prediction algorithms (mirBase, TargetScan, miRanda, tarBase, mirTarget2, and PicTar). We have identified 1,210 differentially expressed mRNAs that are predicted targets of the deregulated miRNAs in the comparison of CML and NBM data. Interestingly, only seven differentially expressed genes were predicted targets of the deregulated miRNAs identified in a comparison of IM-responders and IM-nonresponders. Most of the predicted target genes are involved in cell cycle regulation, MAPK signaling and TGF-beta signaling pathways according to DAVID Bioinformatics Resources analysis, which clusters predicted target genes to known KEGG pathways. To elucidate the biological significance of the differentially expressed miRNAs in TKI-insensitive CML stem/progenitor cells, a number of functional assays were performed. An initial screen of eight miRNAs, selected for their novelty and CML-related potential target genes, was performed by transiently transfecting CML cells with miRNA mimics or inhibitors, and chemically synthesized RNAs which mimic or inhibit mature endogenous miRNAs. Four of the eight miRNA mimics/inhibitors transfected cells displayed significant growth disadvantages and enhanced sensitivity to TKI treatments based on trypan-blue exclusion, thymidine incorporation, apoptosis, and colony-forming cell assays. Q-RT-PCR analysis further showed reduced expression of their predicted target genes in cells transfected with miRNA mimics. Taken together, we have identified aberrant, differentially expressed miRNAs and their target genes in TKI-insensitive CML stem/progenitor cells that may serve as useful biomarkers to predict clinical response of CML patients to TKI therapy and ultimately lead to identification of new therapeutic targets for improved treatment options in CML. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207