MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ASH 2016 to Highlight Cutting-Edge Science in Hematology

2016· article· en· W2553077664 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Toni Marie Bacala

Bibliographic record

VenueOncology Times · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHematologyEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionInternal medicineMedicineComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

American Society of Hematology: American Society of HematologyThe latest clinical and research advances in treating blood disorders will be in the spotlight at the 58th Annual Meeting and Exposition of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) Dec. 3-6 in San Diego. Deemed as the premier gathering of hematology professionals and industry leaders, this year's program features new Special Education sessions and, for the first time, a joint session with the European Hematology Association (EHA). “The ASH Meeting consistently delivers high-quality educational, career development, and networking opportunities for attendees,” said Charles S. Abrams, MD, President of ASH. “It showcases the most cutting-edge science in malignant and non-malignant hematology not shared anywhere else. “New programs this year highlight the rapid rate of progress in hematology research and recognize those who have made a difference in improving the quality of our practice,” he continued. “We received a record number of abstract submissions this year and are on track for record-setting attendance.” Excitement About Precision Medicine Precision medicine gathered momentum last year with President Obama's announcement of his Precision Medicine Initiative. This year, ASH highlights the recent developments in precision medicine and clinical genomics, particularly on novel strategies in molecularly targeted therapy. “This session is designed to inform hematologists and investigators about recent developments in precision medicine with a focus on the development and interpretation of molecular assays for molecularly targeted therapies,” said Gary Lyman, MD, MPH, Chairperson of the Special Education Session on Precision Medicine. “One of the motivations for this was the recently released Institute of Medicine Report entitled ‘Biomarker Tests for Molecularly Targeted Therapies’ from the National Academies Press,” he explained. “The recommendations span the realm of relevant issues from biomarker development, regulation, evidence development, clinical utilization, practice guidelines, reimbursement, healthcare policy formulation, etc.,” Lyman said. “While this topic has received much discussion in the cancer setting, the recommendations are not at all cancer specific but applicable across a broad range of medical conditions where molecularly targeted therapies are now available linked to specific biomarkers including hematology.” Recognizing the role of the FDA and industry players in advancing these new approaches to individualized care, the Special Education Session will also discuss critical regulatory standards and requirements. “The importance of software development for the integration of clinical measures and genomic data within and between institutions will also be discussed along with the importance of establishing a national data repository,” Lyman added. First ASH-EHA Collaboration This meeting marks the first ASH-EHA Joint Symposium on “Pluripotent Stem Cells: Will They Be of Clinical Utility?” to be led by George Q. Daley, MD, of Boston Children's Hospital. “Considerable hope (and hype) accompanied the announcement of derivation of human embryonic stem cells in 1997 and human-induced pluripotent stem cells in 2007,” said Daley. “It's important to step back and assess the status of the science and prospects for clinical translation.” Induced pluripotent stem cells are valued for their therapeutic potential, particularly because they come the patient's own cell, thus eliminating problems in tissue matching and rejection. But the current process of generating these cells involves many risks. In this joint session, experts will provide updates on the viability of these “master cells” in the clinical setting. “I hope our session will illuminate the near-term challenges, highlight opportunities for success, and convey a balanced view of the long-term prospects that regenerative medicine will transform disease treatment,” Daley expressed. ASH Choosing Wisely Champions In 2013, ASH launched the Choosing Wisely campaign in an effort to bring clinicians and patients together in constructive discussions about treatment benefits and cost. The campaign returns this year but with a new and even more engaging offering. “This year's session will be different from the previous years,” shared session chair, Lisa Hicks, MD, of St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto. “When we did the Choosing Wisely session last year, our feeling from the audience was that they were ready to start tackling this problem but needed some models on how to do that.” Earlier this year, ASH and the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Foundation launched the Choosing Wisely Champions initiative to recognize practitioners working on reducing expensive and possibly damaging overuse of clinical tests and procedures. “We went through a competitive process to select three projects and to identify the people leading those projects as our ASH Choosing Wisely Champions for 2016,” said Hicks. “We're using the session to honor and showcase the work of people in the community—the hematologists and oncologists—who are doing implementation work to address overutilization.” Hicks also confirmed that both malignant and non-malignant topics will be represented. “What we're really trying to do is to show people how they can address overutilization in their own practices,” she stressed. “The ASH community will find the presentations and the projects very engaging and very relevant to their own practices.” Social Media & Clinical Trials Social media has proven to be a powerful tool in ASH conferences. Last year's annual meeting generated over 33,000 tweets, 34 percent of which were sent out by health care professionals. Thus, it does not come as a surprise that this year's meeting features a session exploring the benefits and challenges of social media for hematologists. “Social media is an important and valuable tool for communicating science and medicine, and we have learned that it can also be a powerful medium for clinical trial success and recruitment,” said Joseph Mikhael, MD, MEd, FRCPC, FACP, who is the chair of the Committee on Communications for ASH. “Twitter and similar platforms give us innovative avenues and opportunities for sharing updates about new and ongoing trials with stakeholders all over the world, [and] most importantly [with] patients.” The Special Interest Session on “Social Media and Clinical Trials: Physicians, Pharma, and Patients” offers a dynamic venue to discuss how tools like Twitter can be used in clinical trial recruitment, while noting issues such as ethics and privacy. “This panel discussion will feature the insights from researchers and a patient advocate who are actively involved in using social media for clinical trial access, information dissemination, and recruitment,” shared Mikhael. “The session will provide examples of best practices enhancing access for patients to life-saving clinical trials as well as for data sharing on social media.” Managing online relationships between researchers and patients will also be discussed, including the common challenges and helpful approaches to foster this type of interaction. “I hope that people will walk away inspired to explore how implementing these strategies on social media can improve the care we deliver patients in the context of critical medical research,” concluded Mikhael. Toni Marie Bacala is managing editor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncology TimesSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207