MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2553174947

Aromas from Quebec. IV. Chemical composition of the essential oil of Ledum groenlandicum: A review

2015· review· en· W2553174947 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guy J. Collin

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Essential Oils and Natural Products · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytochemistry and Biological Activities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLimoneneComposition (language)ChemistryChemical compositionEssential oilFood scienceOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Limonene and b-selinene are the most important compounds of the essential oil of the aerial parts of Ledum groenlandicum. However there are important variations either in the composition or in the relative percentages between the twelve analyzed commercial samples. Uncommon or rare compounds such as hydroperoxides and p-mentha-1, 8(10)-dien-9-yl esters are observed in one and two samples, respectively. Germacrone, a reputed compound of this oil, is not ever present in the samples. Germacrone epoxides observed in a sample containing almost 30% of germacrone could be the results of an oxidation process. Short comparison with the composition of the Ledumpalustre oil is made. In both cases, equally large variation in compositionis observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Essential Oils and Natural ProductsSame topicPhytochemistry and Biological ActivitiesFrench-language works237,207