MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2553196741 · doi:10.71889/5fylantbak.29861735

Potential Effects Of Aggression, Site, And Proximate Determinants That Facilitate Tree Swallow Range Expansion

2016· article· en· W2553196741 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexandria N. Albers

Bibliographic record

VenueNC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgonistic behaviourEcologyRange (aeronautics)Competition (biology)BiologyPopulationAggressionHome rangeGeographyHabitatDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breeding range expansion occurs when individuals disperse to novel environments over successive breeding seasons and it is expected that both range expanding and native species will be affected. Additionally, native species can experience increased agonistic interactions and competition for limited resources, but they may be able to adapt by adopting behaviors such as increased aggression. Currently, tree swallows, Tachycineta bicolor, are undergoing a range expansion to the southeastern US. In Chapter 2, I investigate the effect expansion may have on a native species of eastern bluebird, Sialia sialis, by comparing territorial defense behavior of bluebirds currently experiencing the tree swallow range expansion (North Carolina) and a more southern bluebird population that is not yet living in sympatry with tree swallows (Alabama). In Chapter 3, I investigate differences between behavior and physiology across tree swallow populations throughout their historical (Wisconsin, Ontario, Nova Scotia) and new (North Carolina, Indiana, Iowa) sites. My results support the prediction that tree swallows on the edge of expansion exhibit aggressive phenotypes and have elevated glucocorticoids. My thesis improves our understanding of differences between geographic populations, expansion effects on native species, and how individuals undergoing expansion are able to survive despite the assumed costs of novel colonization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro)→Same topicAvian ecology and behavior→French-language works237,207→