A cyclopenta[<i>hi</i>]acephenanthrylene bearing two benzoannelated [3.3.3]propellane units: extension of triptindane chemistry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The McMurry reaction of triptindan-9-one (2), a three-fold benzoannelated Cs-symmetrical [3.3.3]propellane ketone, gave trans-9,9′-bitriptindanylidene (5), a sterically crowded stilbene hydrocarbon bearing two E-oriented triptindane moieties, in good yield. Photoisomerization of 5 generated the corresponding cis-stilbene 8 in a photostationary E:Z mixture (55:45), which adopts a similarly crowded C2-symmetrical conformation that is apparently static on the NMR timescale. Photocyclodehydrogenation of 5 via 8 in benzene solution afforded the title hydrocarbon 6, a 1,2,9,10-tetrahydrocyclopenta[hi]acephenanthrylene merged with two triptindane units, in 85% yield. X-ray structure analysis of 6 revealed an essentially planar phenanthrene unit but significant steric repulsion between the pairs of opposite methylene groups of the [3.3.3]propellane cores, giving rise to a C2-symmetrical conformation. Reaction of 2 under modified McMurry conditions (DME instead of THF as a solvent) gave the saturated dimer, 9,9′-bitriptindanyl 7, as a mixture of diastereomers. Attempts to synthesize “columnene” (4), an elusive barrelene derivative fused with two triptindane caps, by three-fold McMurry reaction of triptindane-9,10,11-trione (3) failed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".